He stood up on the dais, facing thousands of people gathered there.
“Dear fellow Indians, we are gathered here to start what our beloved Mahatma has told us to do. All our leaders have been arrested, including Bapuji. But he has told us to continue to fight for independence. The civil disobedience will continue.
British! Quit India!! Bharat Chodo!!
Karo ya Maro!!! Do or Die!!!!”
“Karo ya Maro!!!!” chanted the crowd.
This is just a fragment of my imagination. But I guess this was how people were motivated to participate in the Quit India movement of 1942.
The world was in the middle of the World War II. British started to send out Indian soldiers to the war front to fight their war. The national movement for independence was gaining momentum. Mahatma Gandhi, on 8th August 1942 gave the clarion call to all Indians to “Karo ya Maro, Do or Die” and started the Quit India movement.
The British immediately arrested Gandhiji the very next day. In the course of next few days, it arrested a lot of other national leaders too. But the people of India heard Bapu’s call and responded with massive rallies and protests all over the country.
The British were unwilling to leave the country. But when the WWII continued unabated, Britain realised that India was becoming ungovernable day by day. The President of USA Franklin Roosevelt pressurised the British PM Winston Churchill to concede some of the demands of the Indian agitators. Eventually, the British promised to leave India after the war ended. They finally left India in 1947.
Was the Quit India movement a success, then?
Not entirely.
The Quit India movement was not as successful as anticipated. There were many reasons for this.
- The business men did not support the movement, because the economics of the WW II was giving them rich dividends. The war made sure that the need for uniforms and canvas tents, shoes and such were in short supply in Europe and Indian mills became an important supply point.
- Some political outfits like the Muslim League, and Hindu Mahasabha did not support the movement as they felt it was against their agenda.
- Some princely states too did not support the movement.
- With almost all leaders getting arrested, there was no one to lead the movement. In fact, Gandhiji was released only in 1944 when his ill health became a cause for concern. Gandhiji also lost his wife during the time when he was jailed.
- The British arrested thousands of ordinary citizens who participated in the rallies. Eventually people stopped going to rallies.
Quit India did not succeed for the lack of co-ordination and leadership.
But it remains an important milestone in the struggle for independence.
Thousands of ordinary citizens of India have fought for freedom that we now enjoy and also take for granted.
Freedom is not just a guarantee of rights (for which everyone is ready to take up cudgels nowadays), it is also a responsibility of duties towards the nation.
to understand what freedom means for the younger generation, SG has the compulsory national service. the young cannot take the freedom granted here. nice post meena:) Q is for Quest for Queen of your own life. https://syncwithdeep.wordpress.com/2018/04/19/q-quest-for-queen-of-your-own-life-blogchattera2z-atozchallenge-atoz/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Deep!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good one. The last line is so true!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was wondering what you will write from Q – Quit India – one of the last most important movements from the Indians to push out the British. Yes, it didn’t succeed as it ought to have, but it served as an eye opener to the British Govt. that it was time to leave India!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am glad you liked my post! Yes, Quit India was not a roaring success but it made British realise the truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really fascinating post Meena. In school, I was always taught only good things about M. Gangdi and the Quit India movement, and he was credited with freeing India from British Rule.
It was much later, through reading books, that I realised this is not true. The British basically left India for their own convenience, after using Indians as connon fodded in the world wars. And Gandhi never opposed this.
Would love to read more about this. Kudos on such a well written article.
https://lonelycanopyblog.wordpress.com/2018/04/18/qissa-haveli-ka-a-tale-my-husbands-ancestral-house-within-the-pink-city/
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have been given history in bits and pieces. Never the whole picture. This is true with world history too. Only the advanced students know the whole truth I suppose. Learning about our past will take us forward, prevent us from making the same mistakes once again. British squeezed all the juice they could extract from us, and left us with a divided nation.
Thanks for liking and commenting, Seema
LikeLiked by 1 person
The thing with history is that people tend to forget it. Important to remind people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, indeed. It is a mirror to our future in a way.
Thanks Ashwini.
LikeLike
I wonder how modern day media would have reported these issues if it existed in 1942. Media always plays a very important role in any movement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A very good question, knight. I never thought about it. I will try and find out
LikeLike